<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Goes Real-Time Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://romanelli.com/1stdraft/2009/12/17/google-goes-real-time-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://romanelli.com/1stdraft/2009/12/17/google-goes-real-time-social/</link>
	<description>Romanelli Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:47:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evo Terra</title>
		<link>http://romanelli.com/1stdraft/2009/12/17/google-goes-real-time-social/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Evo Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanelli.com/1stdraft/?p=308#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting on my post over at the Sitwire blog, Ryan. You bring up some good questions with your example AT&amp;T. But I have another one:

What are they to *do* about it?

That&#039;s not a rhetorical question. It&#039;s one I struggle with when I speak to clients. Yes, it&#039;s critical to know what people are saying about your brand _right now_... But what action can you take with that knowledge?

Yes, AT&amp;T ads touting their fab service will be displayed right along side tweets that say how much AT&amp;T blows. That&#039;s a given. What should AT&amp;T do differently with the news? Suspend their ads until it blows over? Change the ads to say &quot;Yeah, we sorta suck now, but we&#039;re really nice!&quot;? 

Intelligence is great. Hell, I make my living providing that. But what are clients to *do* with that info? Other than change their practices and stop sucking. But as I think you&#039;ll agree in your case above, that&#039;s a rather tall order.

Again, thanks for the link. Looking forward to the conversation.

E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting on my post over at the Sitwire blog, Ryan. You bring up some good questions with your example AT&amp;T. But I have another one:</p>
<p>What are they to *do* about it?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not a rhetorical question. It&#8217;s one I struggle with when I speak to clients. Yes, it&#8217;s critical to know what people are saying about your brand _right now_&#8230; But what action can you take with that knowledge?</p>
<p>Yes, AT&amp;T ads touting their fab service will be displayed right along side tweets that say how much AT&amp;T blows. That&#8217;s a given. What should AT&amp;T do differently with the news? Suspend their ads until it blows over? Change the ads to say &#8220;Yeah, we sorta suck now, but we&#8217;re really nice!&#8221;? </p>
<p>Intelligence is great. Hell, I make my living providing that. But what are clients to *do* with that info? Other than change their practices and stop sucking. But as I think you&#8217;ll agree in your case above, that&#8217;s a rather tall order.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the link. Looking forward to the conversation.</p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
